<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Philosophy Bites</title>
    <link>http://odeo.com/channels/2100252-Philosophy-Bites</link>
    <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
    <description>top philosophers interviewed on bite-sized topics
</description>
    <itunes:summary>top philosophers interviewed on bite-sized topics
</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:subtitle>Top philosophers interviewed on bite-sized topics</itunes:subtitle>
    <language>en</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <itunes:image href="http://libsyn.com/podcasts/philosophybites/images/Philosophy_Bites7.jpg"/>
    <image link="http://odeo.com/channels/2100252-Philosophy-Bites" title="Philosophy Bites" url="http://libsyn.com/podcasts/philosophybites/images/Philosophy_Bites7.jpg"/>
    <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 04:31:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 04:31:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
    <itunes:keywords>Philosophy, Philosophers, Nigel Warburton, Political Philosophy, David Edmonds, Philosophy of Religion</itunes:keywords>
    <category>Philosophy</category>
    <category>Philosophers</category>
    <category>Nigel Warburton</category>
    <category>David Edmonds</category>
    <itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture">
      <itunes:category text="Philosophy"/>
    </itunes:category>
    <item>
      <title>Richard Bradley on Understanding Decisions</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com/episodes/25421251-Richard-Bradley-on-Understanding-Decisions</link>
      <description>What is involved in understanding a decision? Richard Bradley of the LSE addresses this question in this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast. As a decision theorist, he views decisions as gambles involving weightings of beliefs and desires.</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>What is involved in understanding a decision? Richard Bradley of the LSE addresses this question in this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast. As a decision theorist, he views decisions as gambles involving weightings of beliefs and desires.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>What is involved in understanding a decision? Richard Bradley of the LSE addresses this question in this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast. As a decision theorist, he views decisions as gambles involving weightings of beliefs and desires.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2009-11-08,25421251</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 04:31:00 -0800</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/philosophybites/Richard_Bradley_on_Understanding_Decisions.mp3"/>
      <itunes:author>Philosophy Bites</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>podcasts</itunes:keywords>
      <category>Philosophy</category>
      <category>Philosophers</category>
      <category>Nigel Warburton</category>
      <category>Political Philosophy</category>
      <category>David Edmonds</category>
      <category>Philosophy of Religion</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tony Coady on Dirty Hands in Politics</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com/episodes/25371802-Tony-Coady-on-Dirty-Hands-in-Politics</link>
      <description>This episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast focuses on the question of whether politicians need ever act immorally. Tony Coady (aka C.A.J. Coady), author of Messy Morality is in conversation with Nigel Warburton.</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>This episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast focuses on the question of whether politicians need ever act immorally. Tony Coady (aka C.A.J. Coady), author of Messy Morality is in conversation with Nigel Warburton.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast focuses on the question of whether politicians need ever act immorally. Tony Coady (aka C.A.J. Coady), author of Messy Morality is in conversation with Nigel Warburton.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2009-10-25,25371802</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 15:24:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/philosophybites/Tony_Coady_on_Dirty_Hands_in_Politics.mp3"/>
      <itunes:author>Philosophy Bites</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>podcasts</itunes:keywords>
      <category>Philosophy</category>
      <category>Philosophers</category>
      <category>Nigel Warburton</category>
      <category>Political Philosophy</category>
      <category>David Edmonds</category>
      <category>Philosophy of Religion</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>John Campbell on Berkeley's Puzzle</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com/episodes/25268893-John-Campbell-on-Berkeley-s-Puzzle</link>
      <description>John Campbell explores Bishop Berkeley's puzzle about what our experience is of in this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast.</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>John Campbell explores Bishop Berkeley's puzzle about what our experience is of in this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>John Campbell explores Bishop Berkeley's puzzle about what our experience is of in this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2009-10-11,25268893</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 11:17:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/philosophybites/John_Campbell_on_Berkeleys_Puzzle_1.mp3"/>
      <itunes:author>Philosophy Bites</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>podcasts</itunes:keywords>
      <category>Philosophy</category>
      <category>Philosophers</category>
      <category>Nigel Warburton</category>
      <category>Political Philosophy</category>
      <category>David Edmonds</category>
      <category>Philosophy of Religion</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Brian Leiter on Nietzsche Myths</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com/episodes/25182243-Brian-Leiter-on-Nietzsche-Myths</link>
      <description>Friedrich Nietzsche has been seen as the philosopher of the Overman, an anti-semite, and a precursor of postmodernist views about truth. But was he any of these? Brian Leiter explores these questions in conversation with Nigel Warburton in this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast.</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>Friedrich Nietzsche has been seen as the philosopher of the Overman, an anti-semite, and a precursor of postmodernist views about truth. But was he any of these? Brian Leiter explores these questions in conversation with Nigel Warburton in this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Friedrich Nietzsche has been seen as the philosopher of the Overman, an anti-semite, and a precursor of postmodernist views about truth. But was he any of these? Brian Leiter explores these questions in conversation with Nigel Warburton in this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2009-09-25,25182243</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 03:35:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/philosophybites/Brian_Leiter_on_Nietzsche_Myths.mp3"/>
      <itunes:author>Philosophy Bites</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>podcasts</itunes:keywords>
      <category>Philosophy</category>
      <category>Philosophers</category>
      <category>Nigel Warburton</category>
      <category>Political Philosophy</category>
      <category>David Edmonds</category>
      <category>Philosophy of Religion</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>John Armstrong on What You Can Do With Philosophy</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com/episodes/25118931-John-Armstrong-on-What-You-Can-Do-With-Philosophy</link>
      <description>What can you do with Philosophy? Not very much, according to some people. John Armstrong disagrees. Find out why in this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>What can you do with Philosophy? Not very much, according to some people. John Armstrong disagrees. Find out why in this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>What can you do with Philosophy? Not very much, according to some people. John Armstrong disagrees. Find out why in this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2009-09-13,25118931</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 09:19:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/philosophybites/John_Armstrong_on_What_You_Can_Do_With_Philosophy_1.mp3"/>
      <itunes:author>Philosophy Bites</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>podcasts</itunes:keywords>
      <category>Philosophy</category>
      <category>Philosophers</category>
      <category>Nigel Warburton</category>
      <category>Political Philosophy</category>
      <category>David Edmonds</category>
      <category>Philosophy of Religion</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Walter Sinnott-Armstrong on Morality Without God</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com/episodes/25035417-Walter-Sinnott-Armstrong-on-Morality-Without-God</link>
      <description>Walter Sinnott-Armstrong argues that God isn't necessary for morality in this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast.</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>Walter Sinnott-Armstrong argues that God isn't necessary for morality in this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Walter Sinnott-Armstrong argues that God isn't necessary for morality in this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2009-08-28,25035417</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 02:55:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/philosophybites/Walter_Sinnott-Armstrong_on_Morality_Without_God.mp3"/>
      <itunes:author>Philosophy Bites</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Walter Sinnott-Armstrong</itunes:keywords>
      <category>Philosophy</category>
      <category>Philosophers</category>
      <category>Nigel Warburton</category>
      <category>Political Philosophy</category>
      <category>David Edmonds</category>
      <category>Philosophy of Religion</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sabine Doring on Emotion</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com/episodes/24959186-Sabine-Doring-on-Emotion</link>
      <description>What is an emotion? How do emotions differ from moods? What part should the emotions play in our lives and in our understanding of what it is to be human? Sabine D&#195;ring addresses these questions in this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast.</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>What is an emotion? How do emotions differ from moods? What part should the emotions play in our lives and in our understanding of what it is to be human? Sabine D&#195;ring addresses these questions in this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>What is an emotion? How do emotions differ from moods? What part should the emotions play in our lives and in our understanding of what it is to be human? Sabine D&#195;ring addresses these questions in this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2009-08-14,24959186</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 01:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/philosophybites/Sabine_Dring_on_Emotion.mp3"/>
      <itunes:author>Philosophy Bites</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Sabine D&amp;#195;&amp;#182;ring</itunes:keywords>
      <category>Philosophy</category>
      <category>Philosophers</category>
      <category>Nigel Warburton</category>
      <category>Political Philosophy</category>
      <category>David Edmonds</category>
      <category>Philosophy of Religion</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ben Rogers on Pascal's Pens&#195;&#169;es</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com/episodes/24883277-Ben-Rogers-on-Pascal-s-Pens%C3%83%C2%A9es</link>
      <description>Blaise Pascal's Pens&#195;es is the subject of this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast. Few philosophers know the Pens&#195;es well,&amp;nbsp; apart from the passage in which Pascal set forth his famous 'wager' - the idea that agnostics should gamble on God existing. Here Ben Rogers explains who Pascal was, and why his book is worth reading.</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>Blaise Pascal's Pens&#195;es is the subject of this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast. Few philosophers know the Pens&#195;es well,&amp;nbsp; apart from the passage in which Pascal set forth his famous 'wager' - the idea that agnostics should gamble on God existing. Here Ben Rogers explains who Pascal was, and why his book is worth reading.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Blaise Pascal's Pens&#195;es is the subject of this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast. Few philosophers know the Pens&#195;es well,&amp;nbsp; apart from the passage in which Pascal set forth his famous 'wager' - the idea that agnostics should gamble on God existing. Here Ben Rogers explains who Pascal was, and why his book is worth reading.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2009-07-29,24883277</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 16:37:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/philosophybites/Ben_Rogers_on__Pascal.mp3"/>
      <itunes:author>Philosophy Bites</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Ben Rogers</itunes:keywords>
      <category>Philosophy</category>
      <category>Philosophers</category>
      <category>Nigel Warburton</category>
      <category>Political Philosophy</category>
      <category>David Edmonds</category>
      <category>Philosophy of Religion</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Marilyn McCord Adams on Evil</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com/episodes/24785630-Marilyn-McCord-Adams-on-Evil</link>
      <description>The Problem of Evil is usually presented as a problem for believers. In this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast Marilyn McCord Adams suggests that it is a problem for optimistic non-believers.</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Problem of Evil is usually presented as a problem for believers. In this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast Marilyn McCord Adams suggests that it is a problem for optimistic non-believers.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The Problem of Evil is usually presented as a problem for believers. In this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast Marilyn McCord Adams suggests that it is a problem for optimistic non-believers.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2009-07-12,24785630</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 03:53:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/philosophybites/Marilyn_McCord_Adams.mp3"/>
      <itunes:author>Philosophy Bites</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Marilyn Adams</itunes:keywords>
      <category>Philosophy</category>
      <category>Philosophers</category>
      <category>Nigel Warburton</category>
      <category>Political Philosophy</category>
      <category>David Edmonds</category>
      <category>Philosophy of Religion</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Luciano Floridi on the Fourth Revolution</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com/episodes/24757186-Luciano-Floridi-on-the-Fourth-Revolution</link>
      <description>New technology is changing our relationship to reality and in the process what we are, argues Luciano Floridi, in this episode of the philosophy podcast Philosophy Bites. This is the fourth revolution.</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>New technology is changing our relationship to reality and in the process what we are, argues Luciano Floridi, in this episode of the philosophy podcast Philosophy Bites. This is the fourth revolution.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>New technology is changing our relationship to reality and in the process what we are, argues Luciano Floridi, in this episode of the philosophy podcast Philosophy Bites. This is the fourth revolution.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2009-06-28,24757186</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 15:51:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/philosophybites/Luciano_Floridi_on_the_4th_Revolution.mp3"/>
      <itunes:author>Philosophy Bites</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Luciano Floridi</itunes:keywords>
      <category>Philosophy</category>
      <category>Philosophers</category>
      <category>Nigel Warburton</category>
      <category>Political Philosophy</category>
      <category>David Edmonds</category>
      <category>Philosophy of Religion</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Paul Snowdon on Persons and Animals</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com/episodes/24703455-Paul-Snowdon-on-Persons-and-Animals</link>
      <description>What is a person and what makes me the same person over time despite change? John Locke emphasized that continuity of memory makes us the same person over time. In contrast Paul Snowdon argues that we should see persons as animals.</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>What is a person and what makes me the same person over time despite change? John Locke emphasized that continuity of memory makes us the same person over time. In contrast Paul Snowdon argues that we should see persons as animals.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>What is a person and what makes me the same person over time despite change? John Locke emphasized that continuity of memory makes us the same person over time. In contrast Paul Snowdon argues that we should see persons as animals.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2009-06-14,24703455</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 11:13:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/philosophybites/Paul_Snowdon_on_Persons_and_Animals.MP3"/>
      <itunes:author>Philosophy Bites</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Paul Snowdon</itunes:keywords>
      <category>Philosophy</category>
      <category>Philosophers</category>
      <category>Nigel Warburton</category>
      <category>Political Philosophy</category>
      <category>David Edmonds</category>
      <category>Philosophy of Religion</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Michael Sandel on What Shouldn't Be Sold</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com/episodes/24622508-Michael-Sandel-on-What-Shouldn-t-Be-Sold</link>
      <description>&amp;nbsp;Michael Sandel. 2009 Reith Lecturer, discusses the moral limits of markets. You can follow Nigel Warburton discussing Sandel's first Reith lecture on Twitter on www.twitter.com/philosophybites from 10.15 p.m UK time on the 13th June as this lecture is broadcast on BBC Radio 4. Add '#goodradio' or '#Reith2009' to any comments you make on Twitter.</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>&amp;nbsp;Michael Sandel. 2009 Reith Lecturer, discusses the moral limits of markets. You can follow Nigel Warburton discussing Sandel's first Reith lecture on Twitter on www.twitter.com/philosophybites from 10.15 p.m UK time on the 13th June as this lecture is broadcast on BBC Radio 4. Add '#goodradio' or '#Reith2009' to any comments you make on Twitter.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>&amp;nbsp;Michael Sandel. 2009 Reith Lecturer, discusses the moral limits of markets. You can follow Nigel Warburton discussing Sandel's first Reith lecture on Twitter on www.twitter.com/philosophybites from 10.15 p.m UK time on the 13th June as this lecture is broadcast on BBC Radio 4. Add '#goodradio' or '#Reith2009' to any comments you make on Twitter.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2009-05-28,24622508</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 15:58:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/philosophybites/Michael_Sandel_on_What_Shouldnt_Be_Sold.mp3"/>
      <itunes:author>Philosophy Bites</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Michael Sandel</itunes:keywords>
      <category>Philosophy</category>
      <category>Philosophers</category>
      <category>Nigel Warburton</category>
      <category>Political Philosophy</category>
      <category>David Edmonds</category>
      <category>Philosophy of Religion</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Allen Buchanan on Enhancement</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com/episodes/24569450-Allen-Buchanan-on-Enhancement</link>
      <description>Philosophy Bites looks at ethical questions raised by enhancement. Technological developments have opened up many new opportunities for intervening in biological processes to improve ourselves. Allen Buchanan of Duke University discusses some of these and their implications in conversation with Nigel Warburton.</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>Philosophy Bites looks at ethical questions raised by enhancement. Technological developments have opened up many new opportunities for intervening in biological processes to improve ourselves. Allen Buchanan of Duke University discusses some of these and their implications in conversation with Nigel Warburton.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Philosophy Bites looks at ethical questions raised by enhancement. Technological developments have opened up many new opportunities for intervening in biological processes to improve ourselves. Allen Buchanan of Duke University discusses some of these and their implications in conversation with Nigel Warburton.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2009-05-16,24569450</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 00:58:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/philosophybites/Allen_Buchanan_on_Enhancement.mp3"/>
      <itunes:author>Philosophy Bites</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Allen Buchanan</itunes:keywords>
      <category>Philosophy</category>
      <category>Philosophers</category>
      <category>Nigel Warburton</category>
      <category>Political Philosophy</category>
      <category>David Edmonds</category>
      <category>Philosophy of Religion</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Walter Sinnott-Armstrong on Moral Psychology</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com/episodes/24529288-Walter-Sinnott-Armstrong-on-Moral-Psychology</link>
      <description>Moral psychology is the empirical study of how people make moral judgements. In this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast Walter Sinnott-Armstrong discusses the relevance of psychological research to moral philosophy.</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>Moral psychology is the empirical study of how people make moral judgements. In this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast Walter Sinnott-Armstrong discusses the relevance of psychological research to moral philosophy.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Moral psychology is the empirical study of how people make moral judgements. In this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast Walter Sinnott-Armstrong discusses the relevance of psychological research to moral philosophy.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2009-05-02,24529288</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 06:29:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/philosophybites/Walter_Sinnott-Armstrong_on_Moral_Psychology.mp3"/>
      <itunes:author>Philosophy Bites</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Walter Sinnott-Armstrong</itunes:keywords>
      <category>Philosophy</category>
      <category>Philosophers</category>
      <category>Nigel Warburton</category>
      <category>Political Philosophy</category>
      <category>David Edmonds</category>
      <category>Philosophy of Religion</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thomas Hurka on Pleasure</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com/episodes/25371804-Thomas-Hurka-on-Pleasure</link>
      <description>Pleasure is something we all want. But is it, and should it be the only thing that we want? Is pleasure all the same kind of thing? Philosopher Thomas Hurka explores the concept of pleasure in conversation with Nigel Warburton in this episode of the podcast Philosophy Bites.</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>Pleasure is something we all want. But is it, and should it be the only thing that we want? Is pleasure all the same kind of thing? Philosopher Thomas Hurka explores the concept of pleasure in conversation with Nigel Warburton in this episode of the podcast Philosophy Bites.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Pleasure is something we all want. But is it, and should it be the only thing that we want? Is pleasure all the same kind of thing? Philosopher Thomas Hurka explores the concept of pleasure in conversation with Nigel Warburton in this episode of the podcast Philosophy Bites.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2009-04-18,25371804</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 03:55:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/philosophybites/Thomas_Hurka_on_Pleasure.MP3"/>
      <itunes:author>Philosophy Bites</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Thomas Hurka</itunes:keywords>
      <category>Philosophy</category>
      <category>Philosophers</category>
      <category>Nigel Warburton</category>
      <category>Political Philosophy</category>
      <category>David Edmonds</category>
      <category>Philosophy of Religion</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thomas Hurka on Pleasure</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com/episodes/24467041-Thomas-Hurka-on-Pleasure</link>
      <description>Pleasure is something we all want. But is it, and should it be the only thing that we want? Is pleasure all the same kind of thing? Philosopher Thomas Hurka explores the concept of pleasure in conversation with Nigel Warburton in this episode of the podcast Philosophy Bites.</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>Pleasure is something we all want. But is it, and should it be the only thing that we want? Is pleasure all the same kind of thing? Philosopher Thomas Hurka explores the concept of pleasure in conversation with Nigel Warburton in this episode of the podcast Philosophy Bites.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Pleasure is something we all want. But is it, and should it be the only thing that we want? Is pleasure all the same kind of thing? Philosopher Thomas Hurka explores the concept of pleasure in conversation with Nigel Warburton in this episode of the podcast Philosophy Bites.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2009-04-18,24467041</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 02:55:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/philosophybites/Thomas_Hurka_on_Pleasure.MP3"/>
      <itunes:author>Philosophy Bites</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Thomas Hurka</itunes:keywords>
      <category>Philosophy</category>
      <category>Philosophers</category>
      <category>Nigel Warburton</category>
      <category>Political Philosophy</category>
      <category>David Edmonds</category>
      <category>Philosophy of Religion</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Terence Irwin on Aristotle's Ethics</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com/episodes/25371805-Terence-Irwin-on-Aristotle-s-Ethics</link>
      <description>This episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast focuses on Aristotle's Ethics. In conversation with Nigel Warburton, Terence Irwin of Oxford University explains the key features of this influential work.</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>This episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast focuses on Aristotle's Ethics. In conversation with Nigel Warburton, Terence Irwin of Oxford University explains the key features of this influential work.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast focuses on Aristotle's Ethics. In conversation with Nigel Warburton, Terence Irwin of Oxford University explains the key features of this influential work.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2009-04-04,25371805</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 13:11:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/philosophybites/Terence_Irwin.mp3"/>
      <itunes:author>Philosophy Bites</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Terence Irwin</itunes:keywords>
      <category>Philosophy</category>
      <category>Philosophers</category>
      <category>Nigel Warburton</category>
      <category>Political Philosophy</category>
      <category>David Edmonds</category>
      <category>Philosophy of Religion</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Terence Irwin on Aristotle's Ethics</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com/episodes/24408452-Terence-Irwin-on-Aristotle-s-Ethics</link>
      <description>This episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast focuses on Aristotle's Ethics. In conversation with Nigel Warburton, Terence Irwin of Oxford University explains the key features of this influential work.</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>This episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast focuses on Aristotle's Ethics. In conversation with Nigel Warburton, Terence Irwin of Oxford University explains the key features of this influential work.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast focuses on Aristotle's Ethics. In conversation with Nigel Warburton, Terence Irwin of Oxford University explains the key features of this influential work.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2009-04-04,24408452</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 12:11:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/philosophybites/Terence_Irwin.mp3"/>
      <itunes:author>Philosophy Bites</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Terence Irwin</itunes:keywords>
      <category>Philosophy</category>
      <category>Philosophers</category>
      <category>Nigel Warburton</category>
      <category>Political Philosophy</category>
      <category>David Edmonds</category>
      <category>Philosophy of Religion</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Raymond Tallis on Assisted Dying</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com/episodes/25371806-Raymond-Tallis-on-Assisted-Dying</link>
      <description>Assisted dying, providing a patient with the means to kill themselves, is a highly controversial issue. For this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast Raymond Tallis, who is both an eminent gerontologist and philosopher, discusses this topic and some of the moral issues surrounding it with interviewer Nigel Warburton.</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>Assisted dying, providing a patient with the means to kill themselves, is a highly controversial issue. For this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast Raymond Tallis, who is both an eminent gerontologist and philosopher, discusses this topic and some of the moral issues surrounding it with interviewer Nigel Warburton.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Assisted dying, providing a patient with the means to kill themselves, is a highly controversial issue. For this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast Raymond Tallis, who is both an eminent gerontologist and philosopher, discusses this topic and some of the moral issues surrounding it with interviewer Nigel Warburton.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2009-03-21,25371806</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 13:08:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/philosophybites/Raymond_Tallis_on_Assisted_Dying.mp3"/>
      <itunes:author>Philosophy Bites</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Raymond Tallis</itunes:keywords>
      <category>Philosophy</category>
      <category>Philosophers</category>
      <category>Nigel Warburton</category>
      <category>Political Philosophy</category>
      <category>David Edmonds</category>
      <category>Philosophy of Religion</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Raymond Tallis on Assisted Dying</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com/episodes/24339864-Raymond-Tallis-on-Assisted-Dying</link>
      <description>Assisted dying, providing a patient with the means to kill themselves, is a highly controversial issue. For this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast Raymond Tallis, who is both an eminent gerontologist and philosopher, discusses this topic and some of the moral issues surrounding it with interviewer Nigel Warburton.</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>Assisted dying, providing a patient with the means to kill themselves, is a highly controversial issue. For this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast Raymond Tallis, who is both an eminent gerontologist and philosopher, discusses this topic and some of the moral issues surrounding it with interviewer Nigel Warburton.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Assisted dying, providing a patient with the means to kill themselves, is a highly controversial issue. For this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast Raymond Tallis, who is both an eminent gerontologist and philosopher, discusses this topic and some of the moral issues surrounding it with interviewer Nigel Warburton.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2009-03-21,24339864</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 12:08:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/philosophybites/Raymond_Tallis_on_Assisted_Dying.mp3"/>
      <itunes:author>Philosophy Bites</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Raymond Tallis</itunes:keywords>
      <category>Philosophy</category>
      <category>Philosophers</category>
      <category>Nigel Warburton</category>
      <category>Political Philosophy</category>
      <category>David Edmonds</category>
      <category>Philosophy of Religion</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Julian Savulescu on the 'Yuk' Factor</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com/episodes/24272860-Julian-Savulescu-on-the-Yuk-Factor</link>
      <description>Should we base our morality on our emotional reactions of disgust? We all have a sense of 'yuk' at some activities or situations. Julian Savulescu of Oxford University discusses the relevance of revulsion to our moral judgements in this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast.</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>Should we base our morality on our emotional reactions of disgust? We all have a sense of 'yuk' at some activities or situations. Julian Savulescu of Oxford University discusses the relevance of revulsion to our moral judgements in this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Should we base our morality on our emotional reactions of disgust? We all have a sense of 'yuk' at some activities or situations. Julian Savulescu of Oxford University discusses the relevance of revulsion to our moral judgements in this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2009-03-08,24272860</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 00:56:00 -0800</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/philosophybites/Julian_Savulescu_on_the_Yuk_Factor.MP3"/>
      <itunes:author>Philosophy Bites</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Julian Savulescu</itunes:keywords>
      <category>Philosophy</category>
      <category>Philosophers</category>
      <category>Nigel Warburton</category>
      <category>Political Philosophy</category>
      <category>David Edmonds</category>
      <category>Philosophy of Religion</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sebastian Gardner on Sartre on Bad Faith</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com/episodes/24142601-Sebastian-Gardner-on-Sartre-on-Bad-Faith</link>
      <description>Jean-Paul Sartre's notion of Bad Faith lies at the core of his existentialist classic Being and Nothingness. In this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast Sebastian Gardner explains what Sartre meant by Bad Faith.</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>Jean-Paul Sartre's notion of Bad Faith lies at the core of his existentialist classic Being and Nothingness. In this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast Sebastian Gardner explains what Sartre meant by Bad Faith.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Jean-Paul Sartre's notion of Bad Faith lies at the core of his existentialist classic Being and Nothingness. In this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast Sebastian Gardner explains what Sartre meant by Bad Faith.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2009-02-20,24142601</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 00:34:00 -0800</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/philosophybites/Sebastian_Gardner_on_Sartre_on_Bad_Faith.mp3"/>
      <itunes:author>Philosophy Bites</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Sebastian Gardner</itunes:keywords>
      <category>Philosophy</category>
      <category>Philosophers</category>
      <category>Nigel Warburton</category>
      <category>Political Philosophy</category>
      <category>David Edmonds</category>
      <category>Philosophy of Religion</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Keith Ward on Idealism in Eastern and Western Philosophy</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com/episodes/24050605-Keith-Ward-on-Idealism-in-Eastern-and-Western-Philosophy</link>
      <description>Questions about the nature of reality are at the heart of all philosophy in both Western and Eastern traditions. Keith Ward gives an overview of the idealist tradition in some Indian philosophy and draws parallels between this tradition and some Western thinkers.</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>Questions about the nature of reality are at the heart of all philosophy in both Western and Eastern traditions. Keith Ward gives an overview of the idealist tradition in some Indian philosophy and draws parallels between this tradition and some Western thinkers.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Questions about the nature of reality are at the heart of all philosophy in both Western and Eastern traditions. Keith Ward gives an overview of the idealist tradition in some Indian philosophy and draws parallels between this tradition and some Western thinkers.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2009-02-06,24050605</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 08:46:00 -0800</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/philosophybites/Keith_Ward_on_Idealism.mp3"/>
      <itunes:author>Philosophy Bites</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Keith Ward</itunes:keywords>
      <category>Philosophy</category>
      <category>Philosophers</category>
      <category>Nigel Warburton</category>
      <category>Political Philosophy</category>
      <category>David Edmonds</category>
      <category>Philosophy of Religion</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>David Papineau on Scientific Realism</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com/episodes/23921164-David-Papineau-on-Scientific-Realism</link>
      <description>Scientists talk about sub-atomic particles which are invisible to the eye. Do such particles really exist? Or are they simply convenient fictions that, for the moment at least, explain the observable phenomena? David Papineau discusses and defends scientific realism in this episode of Philosophy Bites.</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>Scientists talk about sub-atomic particles which are invisible to the eye. Do such particles really exist? Or are they simply convenient fictions that, for the moment at least, explain the observable phenomena? David Papineau discusses and defends scientific realism in this episode of Philosophy Bites.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Scientists talk about sub-atomic particles which are invisible to the eye. Do such particles really exist? Or are they simply convenient fictions that, for the moment at least, explain the observable phenomena? David Papineau discusses and defends scientific realism in this episode of Philosophy Bites.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2009-01-22,23921164</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 07:40:00 -0800</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/philosophybites/David_Papineau_on_Scientific_Realism.mp3"/>
      <itunes:author>Philosophy Bites</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>David Papineau</itunes:keywords>
      <category>Philosophy</category>
      <category>Philosophers</category>
      <category>Nigel Warburton</category>
      <category>Political Philosophy</category>
      <category>David Edmonds</category>
      <category>Philosophy of Religion</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Kate Soper on Alternative Hedonism</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com/episodes/23859059-Kate-Soper-on-Alternative-Hedonism</link>
      <description>Kate Soper believes that we need to rethink how we live in the light of impending environmental catastrophe. She maintains that alternative ways of living can be more enjoyable than consumerism.</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>Kate Soper believes that we need to rethink how we live in the light of impending environmental catastrophe. She maintains that alternative ways of living can be more enjoyable than consumerism.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Kate Soper believes that we need to rethink how we live in the light of impending environmental catastrophe. She maintains that alternative ways of living can be more enjoyable than consumerism.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2009-01-11,23859059</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:29:00 -0800</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/philosophybites/Kate_Soper_on_Alternative_Hedonism.mp3"/>
      <itunes:author>Philosophy Bites</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Kate Soper</itunes:keywords>
      <category>Philosophy</category>
      <category>Philosophers</category>
      <category>Nigel Warburton</category>
      <category>Political Philosophy</category>
      <category>David Edmonds</category>
      <category>Philosophy of Religion</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Chandran Kukathas on Genocide</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com/episodes/23819174-Chandran-Kukathas-on-Genocide</link>
      <description>Genocide is, at first glance, a straightforward term. We understand what it is and why it is such an evil. But, as&amp;nbsp; Chandran Kukathas of the London School of Economics argues in this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast, perhaps the received definition of this term needs refinement.</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>Genocide is, at first glance, a straightforward term. We understand what it is and why it is such an evil. But, as&amp;nbsp; Chandran Kukathas of the London School of Economics argues in this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast, perhaps the received definition of this term needs refinement.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Genocide is, at first glance, a straightforward term. We understand what it is and why it is such an evil. But, as&amp;nbsp; Chandran Kukathas of the London School of Economics argues in this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast, perhaps the received definition of this term needs refinement.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2008-12-29,23819174</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 09:57:00 -0800</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/philosophybites/Chandran_Kukathas_on_Genocide.mp3"/>
      <itunes:author>Philosophy Bites</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Chandran Kukathas</itunes:keywords>
      <category>Philosophy</category>
      <category>Philosophers</category>
      <category>Nigel Warburton</category>
      <category>Political Philosophy</category>
      <category>David Edmonds</category>
      <category>Philosophy of Religion</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>M.M. McCabe on the Paradox of Inquiry</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com/episodes/23752906-M-M-McCabe-on-the-Paradox-of-Inquiry</link>
      <description>How do we learn anything? This isn't a puzzle until you start thinking hard about it. In his dialogue The Meno, Plato presented an apparent paradox about inquiry. M.M. McCabe discusses this paradox and its continuing relevance.</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>How do we learn anything? This isn't a puzzle until you start thinking hard about it. In his dialogue The Meno, Plato presented an apparent paradox about inquiry. M.M. McCabe discusses this paradox and its continuing relevance.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>How do we learn anything? This isn't a puzzle until you start thinking hard about it. In his dialogue The Meno, Plato presented an apparent paradox about inquiry. M.M. McCabe discusses this paradox and its continuing relevance.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2008-12-14,23752906</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 12:17:00 -0800</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/philosophybites/MM_McCabe_on_the_Paradox_of_Inquiry.mp3"/>
      <itunes:author>Philosophy Bites</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>M.M. McCabe</itunes:keywords>
      <category>Philosophy</category>
      <category>Philosophers</category>
      <category>Nigel Warburton</category>
      <category>Political Philosophy</category>
      <category>David Edmonds</category>
      <category>Philosophy of Religion</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Raymond Tallis on Parmenides</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com/episodes/23718561-Raymond-Tallis-on-Parmenides</link>
      <description>Parmenides was one of the most important pre-Socratic philosophers. Raymond Tallis discusses his ideas and influence in this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast.</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>Parmenides was one of the most important pre-Socratic philosophers. Raymond Tallis discusses his ideas and influence in this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Parmenides was one of the most important pre-Socratic philosophers. Raymond Tallis discusses his ideas and influence in this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2008-12-07,23718561</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 10:08:00 -0800</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/philosophybites/Raymond_Tallis_on_Parmenides.mp3"/>
      <itunes:author>Philosophy Bites</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Raymond Tallis</itunes:keywords>
      <category>Philosophy</category>
      <category>Philosophers</category>
      <category>Nigel Warburton</category>
      <category>Political Philosophy</category>
      <category>David Edmonds</category>
      <category>Philosophy of Religion</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Don Cupitt on Non-Realism about God</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com/episodes/23685587-Don-Cupitt-on-Non-Realism-about-God</link>
      <description>Don Cupitt, a controversial theologian and philosopher, whose BBC television series and book The Sea of Faith was extremely influential, giving birth to a theological movement, believes that most religion is too anthropomorphic. In this interview for the&amp;nbsp; Philosophy Bites podcast he&amp;nbsp; explains his non-realist approach to God.</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>Don Cupitt, a controversial theologian and philosopher, whose BBC television series and book The Sea of Faith was extremely influential, giving birth to a theological movement, believes that most religion is too anthropomorphic. In this interview for the&amp;nbsp; Philosophy Bites podcast he&amp;nbsp; explains his non-realist approach to God.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Don Cupitt, a controversial theologian and philosopher, whose BBC television series and book The Sea of Faith was extremely influential, giving birth to a theological movement, believes that most religion is too anthropomorphic. In this interview for the&amp;nbsp; Philosophy Bites podcast he&amp;nbsp; explains his non-realist approach to God.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2008-11-30,23685587</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 09:09:53 -0800</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="" url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/default/"/>
      <itunes:author>Philosophy Bites</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Don Cupitt</itunes:keywords>
      <category>Philosophy</category>
      <category>Philosophers</category>
      <category>Nigel Warburton</category>
      <category>Political Philosophy</category>
      <category>David Edmonds</category>
      <category>Philosophy of Religion</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Don Cupitt on Non-Realism about God</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com/episodes/23686241-Don-Cupitt-on-Non-Realism-about-God</link>
      <description>Don Cupitt, a controversial theologian and philosopher, whose BBC television series and book The Sea of Faith was extremely influential, giving birth to a theological movement, believes that most religion is too anthropomorphic. In this interview for the&amp;nbsp; Philosophy Bites podcast he&amp;nbsp; explains his non-realist approach to God.</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>Don Cupitt, a controversial theologian and philosopher, whose BBC television series and book The Sea of Faith was extremely influential, giving birth to a theological movement, believes that most religion is too anthropomorphic. In this interview for the&amp;nbsp; Philosophy Bites podcast he&amp;nbsp; explains his non-realist approach to God.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Don Cupitt, a controversial theologian and philosopher, whose BBC television series and book The Sea of Faith was extremely influential, giving birth to a theological movement, believes that most religion is too anthropomorphic. In this interview for the&amp;nbsp; Philosophy Bites podcast he&amp;nbsp; explains his non-realist approach to God.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2008-11-30,23686241</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 09:09:00 -0800</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/philosophybites/Don_Cupitt_on_Non-Realism_About_God.mp3"/>
      <itunes:author>Philosophy Bites</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Don Cupitt</itunes:keywords>
      <category>Philosophy</category>
      <category>Philosophers</category>
      <category>Nigel Warburton</category>
      <category>Political Philosophy</category>
      <category>David Edmonds</category>
      <category>Philosophy of Religion</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Wendy Brown on Tolerance</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com/episodes/23659338-Wendy-Brown-on-Tolerance</link>
      <description>Tolerance is usually thought of as the great virtue of democratic societies. Wendy Brown of UC Berkeley asks some sceptical questions about the concept of tolerance and how it can be used to express power relationships in this interview for Philosophy Bites.</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>Tolerance is usually thought of as the great virtue of democratic societies. Wendy Brown of UC Berkeley asks some sceptical questions about the concept of tolerance and how it can be used to express power relationships in this interview for Philosophy Bites.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Tolerance is usually thought of as the great virtue of democratic societies. Wendy Brown of UC Berkeley asks some sceptical questions about the concept of tolerance and how it can be used to express power relationships in this interview for Philosophy Bites.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2008-11-23,23659338</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 10:16:00 -0800</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/philosophybites/Wendy_Brown_on_Tolerance.mp3"/>
      <itunes:author>Philosophy Bites</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Wendy Brown</itunes:keywords>
      <category>Philosophy</category>
      <category>Philosophers</category>
      <category>Nigel Warburton</category>
      <category>Political Philosophy</category>
      <category>David Edmonds</category>
      <category>Philosophy of Religion</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Anne Phillips on Political Representation</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com/episodes/23629165-Anne-Phillips-on-Political-Representation</link>
      <description>Political representation in a democracy doesn't necessarily reflect the variety of people within a society. Most noticeably, there is a much lower percentage of women acting as representatives than there is in the wider population. Does this matter? Anne Phillips believes it does. She explains why in this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast.</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>Political representation in a democracy doesn't necessarily reflect the variety of people within a society. Most noticeably, there is a much lower percentage of women acting as representatives than there is in the wider population. Does this matter? Anne Phillips believes it does. She explains why in this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Political representation in a democracy doesn't necessarily reflect the variety of people within a society. Most noticeably, there is a much lower percentage of women acting as representatives than there is in the wider population. Does this matter? Anne Phillips believes it does. She explains why in this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2008-11-16,23629165</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 14:42:00 -0800</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/philosophybites/Anne_Phillips_on_Political_Representation.mp3"/>
      <itunes:author>Philosophy Bites</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Anne Phillips</itunes:keywords>
      <category>Philosophy</category>
      <category>Philosophers</category>
      <category>Nigel Warburton</category>
      <category>Political Philosophy</category>
      <category>David Edmonds</category>
      <category>Philosophy of Religion</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Anthony Grayling on Bombing Civilians in Wartime</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com/episodes/23598731-Anthony-Grayling-on-Bombing-Civilians-in-Wartime</link>
      <description>Anthony Grayling argues that bombing civilians in Dresden and other German cities in the Second World War was morally wrong.</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>Anthony Grayling argues that bombing civilians in Dresden and other German cities in the Second World War was morally wrong.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Anthony Grayling argues that bombing civilians in Dresden and other German cities in the Second World War was morally wrong.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2008-11-09,23598731</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 15:23:00 -0800</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/philosophybites/Anthony_Grayling_on_Bombing_Civilians_in_Wartime.mp3"/>
      <itunes:author>Philosophy Bites</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Anthony Grayling</itunes:keywords>
      <category>Philosophy</category>
      <category>Philosophers</category>
      <category>Nigel Warburton</category>
      <category>Political Philosophy</category>
      <category>David Edmonds</category>
      <category>Philosophy of Religion</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Christopher Shields on Personal Identity</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com/episodes/23569253-Christopher-Shields-on-Personal-Identity</link>
      <description>What makes anyone the same person over time? In this interview for Philosophy Bites Christopher Shields addresses this question of personal identity, one which, as he points out, has perplexed philosophers since antiquity.</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>What makes anyone the same person over time? In this interview for Philosophy Bites Christopher Shields addresses this question of personal identity, one which, as he points out, has perplexed philosophers since antiquity.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>What makes anyone the same person over time? In this interview for Philosophy Bites Christopher Shields addresses this question of personal identity, one which, as he points out, has perplexed philosophers since antiquity.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2008-11-02,23569253</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 22:48:00 -0800</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/philosophybites/Christopher_Shields_on_Personal_Identity.mp3"/>
      <itunes:author>Philosophy Bites</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Christopher Shields</itunes:keywords>
      <category>Philosophy</category>
      <category>Philosophers</category>
      <category>Nigel Warburton</category>
      <category>Political Philosophy</category>
      <category>David Edmonds</category>
      <category>Philosophy of Religion</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Alexander Nehamas on Friendship</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com/episodes/25371807-Alexander-Nehamas-on-Friendship</link>
      <description>Alexander Nehamas explores the value of friendship in this interview with Nigel Warburton for the Philosophy Bites podcast.</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>Alexander Nehamas explores the value of friendship in this interview with Nigel Warburton for the Philosophy Bites podcast.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Alexander Nehamas explores the value of friendship in this interview with Nigel Warburton for the Philosophy Bites podcast.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2008-10-26,25371807</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 15:24:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/philosophybites/Alexander_Nehamas_on_Friendship.mp3"/>
      <itunes:author>Philosophy Bites</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Alexander Nehamas</itunes:keywords>
      <category>Philosophy</category>
      <category>Philosophers</category>
      <category>Nigel Warburton</category>
      <category>Political Philosophy</category>
      <category>David Edmonds</category>
      <category>Philosophy of Religion</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Alexander Nehamas on Friendship</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com/episodes/23533878-Alexander-Nehamas-on-Friendship</link>
      <description>Alexander Nehamas explores the value of friendship in this interview with Nigel Warburton for the Philosophy Bites podcast.</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>Alexander Nehamas explores the value of friendship in this interview with Nigel Warburton for the Philosophy Bites podcast.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Alexander Nehamas explores the value of friendship in this interview with Nigel Warburton for the Philosophy Bites podcast.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2008-10-26,23533878</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 14:24:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/philosophybites/Alexander_Nehamas_on_Friendship.mp3"/>
      <itunes:author>Philosophy Bites</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Alexander Nehamas</itunes:keywords>
      <category>Philosophy</category>
      <category>Philosophers</category>
      <category>Nigel Warburton</category>
      <category>Political Philosophy</category>
      <category>David Edmonds</category>
      <category>Philosophy of Religion</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Raymond Geuss on Real Politics</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com/episodes/23506809-Raymond-Geuss-on-Real-Politics</link>
      <description>Raymond Geuss wants political philosophers to focus on real politics rather than abstract notions. In this interview with Nigel Warburton for Philosophy Bites he explains why he believes philosophers such as Robert Nozick and John Rawls were fundamentally misguided in the way they approached political philosophy.</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>Raymond Geuss wants political philosophers to focus on real politics rather than abstract notions. In this interview with Nigel Warburton for Philosophy Bites he explains why he believes philosophers such as Robert Nozick and John Rawls were fundamentally misguided in the way they approached political philosophy.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Raymond Geuss wants political philosophers to focus on real politics rather than abstract notions. In this interview with Nigel Warburton for Philosophy Bites he explains why he believes philosophers such as Robert Nozick and John Rawls were fundamentally misguided in the way they approached political philosophy.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2008-10-19,23506809</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 14:12:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/philosophybites/Raymond_Geuss_on_Real_Politics.mp3"/>
      <itunes:author>Philosophy Bites</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Raymond Geuss</itunes:keywords>
      <category>Philosophy</category>
      <category>Philosophers</category>
      <category>Nigel Warburton</category>
      <category>Political Philosophy</category>
      <category>David Edmonds</category>
      <category>Philosophy of Religion</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Roger Crisp on Virtue</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com/episodes/23479057-Roger-Crisp-on-Virtue</link>
      <description>Roger Crisp discusses the nature of virtue in this interview with Nigel Warburton for&amp;nbsp; the Philosophy Bites podcast.</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>Roger Crisp discusses the nature of virtue in this interview with Nigel Warburton for&amp;nbsp; the Philosophy Bites podcast.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Roger Crisp discusses the nature of virtue in this interview with Nigel Warburton for&amp;nbsp; the Philosophy Bites podcast.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2008-10-12,23479057</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 13:30:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/philosophybites/Roger_Crisp_on_the_Virtues.mp3"/>
      <itunes:author>Philosophy Bites</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Roger Crisp</itunes:keywords>
      <category>Philosophy</category>
      <category>Philosophers</category>
      <category>Nigel Warburton</category>
      <category>Political Philosophy</category>
      <category>David Edmonds</category>
      <category>Philosophy of Religion</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Anthony Appiah on Experiments in Ethics</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com/episodes/23454133-Anthony-Appiah-on-Experiments-in-Ethics</link>
      <description>Anthony Appiah makes the case for the relevance of psychological experiments to our ethical reasoning in this interview for the Philosophy Bites podcast.</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>Anthony Appiah makes the case for the relevance of psychological experiments to our ethical reasoning in this interview for the Philosophy Bites podcast.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Anthony Appiah makes the case for the relevance of psychological experiments to our ethical reasoning in this interview for the Philosophy Bites podcast.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2008-10-05,23454133</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 11:54:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/philosophybites/Anthony_Appiah_on_Experiments_in_Ethics.mp3"/>
      <itunes:author>Philosophy Bites</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Anthony Appiah</itunes:keywords>
      <category>Philosophy</category>
      <category>Philosophers</category>
      <category>Nigel Warburton</category>
      <category>Political Philosophy</category>
      <category>David Edmonds</category>
      <category>Philosophy of Religion</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Christopher Janaway on Nietzsche on Morality</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com/episodes/23413412-Christopher-Janaway-on-Nietzsche-on-Morality</link>
      <description>Friedrich Nietzsche's The Genealogy of Morality provides a radical view of the origins of our values. Nigel Warburton interviews Christopher Janaway about this important book in this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast.</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>Friedrich Nietzsche's The Genealogy of Morality provides a radical view of the origins of our values. Nigel Warburton interviews Christopher Janaway about this important book in this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Friedrich Nietzsche's The Genealogy of Morality provides a radical view of the origins of our values. Nigel Warburton interviews Christopher Janaway about this important book in this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2008-09-28,23413412</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 02:05:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/philosophybites/Christopher_Janaway_on_Nietzsche_on_Morality.mp3"/>
      <itunes:author>Philosophy Bites</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Christopher Janaway</itunes:keywords>
      <category>Philosophy</category>
      <category>Philosophers</category>
      <category>Nigel Warburton</category>
      <category>Political Philosophy</category>
      <category>David Edmonds</category>
      <category>Philosophy of Religion</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Peter Cave on Paradoxes</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com/episodes/23378314-Peter-Cave-on-Paradoxes</link>
      <description>Philosophers have been fascinated by paradoxes since ancient times. In this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast Nigel Warburton interviews Peter Cave about paradoxes and their relevance to philosophy.</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>Philosophers have been fascinated by paradoxes since ancient times. In this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast Nigel Warburton interviews Peter Cave about paradoxes and their relevance to philosophy.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Philosophers have been fascinated by paradoxes since ancient times. In this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast Nigel Warburton interviews Peter Cave about paradoxes and their relevance to philosophy.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2008-09-21,23378314</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 03:15:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/philosophybites/Peter_Cave_on_Paradoxes.mp3"/>
      <itunes:author>Philosophy Bites</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Peter Cave</itunes:keywords>
      <category>Philosophy</category>
      <category>Philosophers</category>
      <category>Nigel Warburton</category>
      <category>Political Philosophy</category>
      <category>David Edmonds</category>
      <category>Philosophy of Religion</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Adrian Moore on Kant's Metaphysics</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com/episodes/23348396-Adrian-Moore-on-Kant-s-Metaphysics</link>
      <description>Immanuel Kant's Critique of Pure Reason is a notoriously difficult work. In this interview for Philosophy Bites A.W. Moore of Oxford University gives a succinct account of this complex and influential attempt to clarify the limits of human understanding.</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>Immanuel Kant's Critique of Pure Reason is a notoriously difficult work. In this interview for Philosophy Bites A.W. Moore of Oxford University gives a succinct account of this complex and influential attempt to clarify the limits of human understanding.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Immanuel Kant's Critique of Pure Reason is a notoriously difficult work. In this interview for Philosophy Bites A.W. Moore of Oxford University gives a succinct account of this complex and influential attempt to clarify the limits of human understanding.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2008-09-14,23348396</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 11:45:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/philosophybites/Adrian_Moore_on_Kants_Metaphysics.mp3"/>
      <itunes:author>Philosophy Bites</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Adrian Moore</itunes:keywords>
      <category>Philosophy</category>
      <category>Philosophers</category>
      <category>Nigel Warburton</category>
      <category>Political Philosophy</category>
      <category>David Edmonds</category>
      <category>Philosophy of Religion</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Barry Smith on Neuroscience</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com/episodes/23257872-Barry-Smith-on-Neuroscience</link>
      <description>Philosophers of mind have traditionally introspected sitting alone in their rooms. Now new developments in neuroscience are producing surprising results, some of which are relevant to philosophy. Phenomena such as blind sight and mirror neurones suggest that we would be foolish to decide what is possible a priori. Barry Smith gives an insight in to this intriguing area in this episode of Philosophy Bites.</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>Philosophers of mind have traditionally introspected sitting alone in their rooms. Now new developments in neuroscience are producing surprising results, some of which are relevant to philosophy. Phenomena such as blind sight and mirror neurones suggest that we would be foolish to decide what is possible a priori. Barry Smith gives an insight in to this intriguing area in this episode of Philosophy Bites.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Philosophers of mind have traditionally introspected sitting alone in their rooms. Now new developments in neuroscience are producing surprising results, some of which are relevant to philosophy. Phenomena such as blind sight and mirror neurones suggest that we would be foolish to decide what is possible a priori. Barry Smith gives an insight in to this intriguing area in this episode of Philosophy Bites.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2008-09-07,23257872</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 06:16:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/philosophybites/Barry_Smith_on_Neuroscience_1.mp3"/>
      <itunes:author>Philosophy Bites</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Barry Smith</itunes:keywords>
      <category>Philosophy</category>
      <category>Philosophers</category>
      <category>Nigel Warburton</category>
      <category>Political Philosophy</category>
      <category>David Edmonds</category>
      <category>Philosophy of Religion</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Barry C. Smith on Neuroscience</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com/episodes/23348397-Barry-C-Smith-on-Neuroscience</link>
      <description>Philosophers of mind have traditionally introspected sitting alone in their rooms. Now new developments in neuroscience are producing surprising results, some of which are relevant to philosophy. Phenomena such as blind sight and mirror neurones suggest that we would be foolish to decide what is possible a priori. Barry C. Smith gives an insight in to this intriguing area in this episode of Philosophy Bites.</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>Philosophers of mind have traditionally introspected sitting alone in their rooms. Now new developments in neuroscience are producing surprising results, some of which are relevant to philosophy. Phenomena such as blind sight and mirror neurones suggest that we would be foolish to decide what is possible a priori. Barry C. Smith gives an insight in to this intriguing area in this episode of Philosophy Bites.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Philosophers of mind have traditionally introspected sitting alone in their rooms. Now new developments in neuroscience are producing surprising results, some of which are relevant to philosophy. Phenomena such as blind sight and mirror neurones suggest that we would be foolish to decide what is possible a priori. Barry C. Smith gives an insight in to this intriguing area in this episode of Philosophy Bites.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2008-09-07,23348397</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 06:16:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/philosophybites/Barry_Smith_on_Neuroscience_1.mp3"/>
      <itunes:author>Philosophy Bites</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Barry Smith</itunes:keywords>
      <category>Philosophy</category>
      <category>Philosophers</category>
      <category>Nigel Warburton</category>
      <category>Political Philosophy</category>
      <category>David Edmonds</category>
      <category>Philosophy of Religion</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ray Monk on Philosophy and Biography</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com/episodes/23233824-Ray-Monk-on-Philosophy-and-Biography</link>
      <description>Ray Monk discusses the relationship between philosophy and biography in this interview with Nigel Warburton for the Philosophy Bites podcast. Can an understanding the life of a philosopher help us understand that philosopher's work? Is there anything that philosophers can learn from biography? Monk as author of biographies of Ludwig Wittgenstein and Bertrand Russell, two very different personalities, is well-placed to address these questions.</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>Ray Monk discusses the relationship between philosophy and biography in this interview with Nigel Warburton for the Philosophy Bites podcast. Can an understanding the life of a philosopher help us understand that philosopher's work? Is there anything that philosophers can learn from biography? Monk as author of biographies of Ludwig Wittgenstein and Bertrand Russell, two very different personalities, is well-placed to address these questions.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Ray Monk discusses the relationship between philosophy and biography in this interview with Nigel Warburton for the Philosophy Bites podcast. Can an understanding the life of a philosopher help us understand that philosopher's work? Is there anything that philosophers can learn from biography? Monk as author of biographies of Ludwig Wittgenstein and Bertrand Russell, two very different personalities, is well-placed to address these questions.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2008-08-31,23233824</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 10:46:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/philosophybites/Ray_Monk_on_Philosophy_and_Biography.mp3"/>
      <itunes:author>Philosophy Bites</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Ray Monk</itunes:keywords>
      <category>Philosophy</category>
      <category>Philosophers</category>
      <category>Nigel Warburton</category>
      <category>Political Philosophy</category>
      <category>David Edmonds</category>
      <category>Philosophy of Religion</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>M.M. McCabe on Socratic Method</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com/episodes/23205027-M-M-McCabe-on-Socratic-Method</link>
      <description>Philosophy began in earnest with Socrates. He asked impertinent questions. In this interview with M.M. McCabe, Philosophy Bites explores the nature of Socratic Method and Socrates' claim that the unexamined life is not worth living.</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>Philosophy began in earnest with Socrates. He asked impertinent questions. In this interview with M.M. McCabe, Philosophy Bites explores the nature of Socratic Method and Socrates' claim that the unexamined life is not worth living.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Philosophy began in earnest with Socrates. He asked impertinent questions. In this interview with M.M. McCabe, Philosophy Bites explores the nature of Socratic Method and Socrates' claim that the unexamined life is not worth living.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2008-08-24,23205027</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 08:39:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/philosophybites/M.M._McCabe_on_Socratic_Method.mp3"/>
      <itunes:author>Philosophy Bites</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>M.M. McCabe</itunes:keywords>
      <category>Philosophy</category>
      <category>Philosophers</category>
      <category>Nigel Warburton</category>
      <category>Political Philosophy</category>
      <category>David Edmonds</category>
      <category>Philosophy of Religion</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Aaron Ridley on Nietzsche on Art and Truth</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com/episodes/23185912-Aaron-Ridley-on-Nietzsche-on-Art-and-Truth</link>
      <description>Friedrich Nietzsche's ideas about art and truth run through much of his philosophical writing, but are most apparent in his first book, The Birth of Tragedy. In this episode of Philosophy Bites Nigel Warburton interviews Aaron Ridley about this topic.</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>Friedrich Nietzsche's ideas about art and truth run through much of his philosophical writing, but are most apparent in his first book, The Birth of Tragedy. In this episode of Philosophy Bites Nigel Warburton interviews Aaron Ridley about this topic.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Friedrich Nietzsche's ideas about art and truth run through much of his philosophical writing, but are most apparent in his first book, The Birth of Tragedy. In this episode of Philosophy Bites Nigel Warburton interviews Aaron Ridley about this topic.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2008-08-16,23185912</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 15:16:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/philosophybites/Aaron_Ridley_on_Nietzsche_on_Art_and_Truth.mp3"/>
      <itunes:author>Philosophy Bites</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Aaron Ridley</itunes:keywords>
      <category>Philosophy</category>
      <category>Philosophers</category>
      <category>Nigel Warburton</category>
      <category>Political Philosophy</category>
      <category>David Edmonds</category>
      <category>Philosophy of Religion</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Clare Carlisle on Kierkegaard's Fear and Trembling</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com/episodes/23167370-Clare-Carlisle-on-Kierkegaard-s-Fear-and-Trembling</link>
      <description>Soren Kierkegaard's Fear and Trembling retells and interprets the story of Abraham and Isaac. In Kierkegaard's hands the story becomes a model for the human predicament. In this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast Clare Carlisle provides an interesting overview of some of Kierkegaard's themes in this book.</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>Soren Kierkegaard's Fear and Trembling retells and interprets the story of Abraham and Isaac. In Kierkegaard's hands the story becomes a model for the human predicament. In this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast Clare Carlisle provides an interesting overview of some of Kierkegaard's themes in this book.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Soren Kierkegaard's Fear and Trembling retells and interprets the story of Abraham and Isaac. In Kierkegaard's hands the story becomes a model for the human predicament. In this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast Clare Carlisle provides an interesting overview of some of Kierkegaard's themes in this book.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2008-08-10,23167370</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 09:48:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/philosophybites/Clare_Carlisle_on_Kierkegaards_Fear_And_Trembling.mp3"/>
      <itunes:author>Philosophy Bites</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Clare Carlisle</itunes:keywords>
      <category>Philosophy</category>
      <category>Philosophers</category>
      <category>Nigel Warburton</category>
      <category>Political Philosophy</category>
      <category>David Edmonds</category>
      <category>Philosophy of Religion</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Alex Neill - the Paradox of Tragedy</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com/episodes/23142566-Alex-Neill-the-Paradox-of-Tragedy</link>
      <description>How can we enjoy watching tragedy when it is a genre that deals with suffering and pain? In this episode of&amp;nbsp; the Philosophy Bites podcast Alex Neill explains what the paradox of tragedy is, and shows how he thinks it can be dissolved. He also relates this discussion to related questions about our experience of horror movies.</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>How can we enjoy watching tragedy when it is a genre that deals with suffering and pain? In this episode of&amp;nbsp; the Philosophy Bites podcast Alex Neill explains what the paradox of tragedy is, and shows how he thinks it can be dissolved. He also relates this discussion to related questions about our experience of horror movies.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>How can we enjoy watching tragedy when it is a genre that deals with suffering and pain? In this episode of&amp;nbsp; the Philosophy Bites podcast Alex Neill explains what the paradox of tragedy is, and shows how he thinks it can be dissolved. He also relates this discussion to related questions about our experience of horror movies.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2008-08-03,23142566</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 11:47:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/philosophybites/Alex_Neill_The_Paradox_of_Tragedy.mp3"/>
      <itunes:author>Philosophy Bites</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Alex Neill</itunes:keywords>
      <category>Philosophy</category>
      <category>Philosophers</category>
      <category>Nigel Warburton</category>
      <category>Political Philosophy</category>
      <category>David Edmonds</category>
      <category>Philosophy of Religion</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Quentin Skinner on Machiavelli's The Prince</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com/episodes/23119410-Quentin-Skinner-on-Machiavelli-s-The-Prince</link>
      <description>Niccolo Machiavelli's The Prince is one of the most notorious works of political philosophy ever written. Quentin Skinner sets it in its historical context and explains its key themes in this episode of Philosophy Bites.</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>Niccolo Machiavelli's The Prince is one of the most notorious works of political philosophy ever written. Quentin Skinner sets it in its historical context and explains its key themes in this episode of Philosophy Bites.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Niccolo Machiavelli's The Prince is one of the most notorious works of political philosophy ever written. Quentin Skinner sets it in its historical context and explains its key themes in this episode of Philosophy Bites.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2008-07-27,23119410</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 15:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/philosophybites/Quentin_Skinner_on_Machiavellis_The_Prince.mp3"/>
      <itunes:author>Philosophy Bites</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Quentin Skinner</itunes:keywords>
      <category>Philosophy</category>
      <category>Philosophers</category>
      <category>Nigel Warburton</category>
      <category>Political Philosophy</category>
      <category>David Edmonds</category>
      <category>Philosophy of Religion</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
